When working with fluid transfer systems, especially in automotive applications like brake lines, the type of flare connection used is critical for safety and performance. Two common types you’ll encounter are the bubble flare (also known as DIN or ISO flare) and the inverted flare (often called double flare or SAE flare).
While both serve to create a secure, leak-proof seal between a tube and a fitting, their designs and the way they achieve this seal are distinctly different. Understanding these differences is essential for choosing the correct fitting, using the right flaring tool, and ensuring the reliability of your hydraulic or pneumatic system.
What is Bubble Flare?
A bubble flare, also known as a DIN or ISO flare, is a type of tubing end commonly used in automotive brake systems, particularly in European vehicles. Unlike a traditional double flare, which has a two-stage process that folds the tubing back on itself, a bubble flare is created in a single step, forming a rounded, mushroom-like end on the brake line.
This distinctive “bubble” shape seats against a corresponding concave surface in the fitting, creating a secure, leak-proof seal. While generally considered less robust than double flares in terms of pressure resistance, bubble flares are effective for their intended applications and are often favored for their simpler manufacturing process.
What is Inverted Flare?
An inverted flare, often referred to as a SAE (Society of Automotive Engineers) flare or double flare (though there’s a subtle distinction, it’s commonly used interchangeably), is a widely used type of tube connection in automotive and hydraulic systems, particularly for brake lines, fuel lines, and power steering.
It’s characterized by a 45-degree conical shape on the end of the tubing that’s flared outward, and then folded back on itself to create a stronger, double-walled sealing surface. This double-wall design offers enhanced resistance to cracking and fatigue, making it highly durable and reliable for applications subject to high pressure and vibration.
The flared end of the tube then seats into a corresponding internal, or “inverted,” conical seat within the fitting, forming a robust metal-to-metal seal when tightened.
Bubble Flare vs Inverted Flare
Both bubble flares and inverted flares are essential tube end formations in automotive and hydraulic systems, designed to create secure, leak-free connections. Understanding their fundamental differences is key to proper application and safety.
This comparison will delve into the distinct characteristics of each type, highlighting their design, application, and sealing mechanisms.
Design and Formation
Bubble flares are formed by creating a rounded, mushroom-like bubble at the end of the tubing. This is typically a single-step flaring process where the tube end is compressed into a die, resulting in a gentle, convex curve. The simplicity of this design makes them relatively quick and easy to produce.
In contrast, inverted flares, often called double flares, involve a two-step process. First, the tube is flared outwards to a 45-degree angle. Then, the flaring tool pushes the cone back into itself, creating a double-wall thickness at the sealing surface. This reinforces the flare and makes it more robust.
Sealing Mechanism
A bubble flare seals when its rounded, convex surface mates with a concave, or female, seat within the fitting. The pressure from tightening compresses the bubble into the seat, forming a tight, metal-to-metal seal. The gentle curve of the bubble is designed to accommodate slight misalignments and provide a good seal.
The inverted flare’s sealing mechanism relies on its precisely formed 45-degree double-walled cone. This cone presses firmly against a corresponding male conical seat within the fitting. The double wall provides increased surface area and strength, enhancing the seal’s integrity, especially under high pressure.
Common Applications
Bubble flares are predominantly found in European and some Asian automotive brake systems. They are well-suited for situations where moderate pressure and vibration are present, and their simpler design can be an advantage in manufacturing and repair. They are also sometimes seen in fuel lines.
Inverted flares are ubiquitous in North American automotive applications, including brake lines, fuel lines, power steering lines, and transmission cooler lines. Their robust, double-wall construction makes them ideal for high-pressure environments and where greater durability and resistance to fatigue are required. They are also common in many general hydraulic applications.
Material Compatibility
Bubble flares are commonly used with steel and sometimes copper-nickel (cunifer) tubing. The softer nature of these materials allows for the formation of the rounded bubble without excessive stress, facilitating a reliable seal with the mating fitting.
Inverted flares are also primarily used with steel and copper-nickel tubing, but their double-wall design can be particularly beneficial when working with harder tubing materials, as it provides a stronger sealing surface. The robustness of the inverted flare makes it suitable for a wider range of material hardness.
Advantages and Disadvantages
Bubble flares offer the advantage of simpler and quicker formation, often requiring less force and specialized tooling. They are also generally less prone to cracking during formation due to their gentle curve. However, they may be less resistant to extreme pressures or severe vibrations compared to inverted flares.
Inverted flares boast superior strength and durability due to their double-wall construction, making them excellent for high-pressure and high-vibration applications. Their robust design provides a very secure and leak-resistant seal. The primary disadvantage is that their formation process is more complex and requires precise execution to avoid cracks in the flare.
| Feature | Bubble Flare | Inverted Flare |
| Design | Rounded, single-wall “bubble” | 45-degree double-wall cone |
| Formation | Single-step, simpler | Two-step, more complex |
| Sealing | Convex mates with concave seat | Conical mates with male conical seat |
| Typical Use | European automotive brake lines, fuel lines | North American automotive (brake, fuel, power steering), general hydraulics |
| Strength/Durability | Moderate | High, excellent for high pressure/vibration |
How to Make Inverted Flare Brake Line?
Creating an inverted flare on a brake line is a crucial skill for automotive repair, ensuring a leak-free and safe brake system. This process requires precision and the correct tools to avoid potential fluid leaks and brake failure.
Step 1: Cutting and Deburring the Line
First, measure and cut the brake line to the desired length using a specialized tubing cutter. This tool ensures a straight, clean cut essential for a proper flare. After cutting, use the deburring tool (often integrated into the cutter) to remove any sharp edges or burrs from both the inside and outside of the cut end.
This deburring step is critical as any imperfections can lead to a weak flare or potential leakage. A smooth, clean edge allows the flaring tool to create a uniform and strong inverted cone, preventing stress concentrations that could cause cracks during the flaring process or under pressure in operation.
Step 2: Installing the Flare Nut
Before flaring, slide the appropriate flare nut onto the brake line. Ensure the threaded end of the nut faces the end of the line that will be flared. Forgetting this step means you’ll have to cut off your newly formed flare, install the nut, and start the flaring process all over again.
Proper orientation of the flare nut is vital for eventual installation into the brake system. The nut needs to fit over the completed flare and thread securely into the mating port on the master cylinder, caliper, or other brake components, creating the final sealed connection.
Step 3: Clamping the Tubing
Secure the brake line firmly in the flaring tool’s clamping block. The correct amount of tubing must protrude from the block, typically determined by a depth gauge or the specific instructions of your flaring tool. Too little or too much protrusion will result in an improper flare.
The clamping block holds the tubing rigidly, preventing it from slipping or deforming during the flaring operation. This stability is essential for achieving a concentric and correctly sized flare, which is paramount for a reliable, leak-proof seal within the brake system.
Step 4: Forming the Flare
Insert the first flaring punch (often called the “bubble” or “pilot” punch) into the end of the tubing. Gradually apply pressure with the flaring tool’s yoke, pushing the punch into the tubing to create a small, preliminary bell shape. Do not overtighten, as this can weaken the material.
Next, remove the first punch and insert the second, inverted cone-shaped punch. Apply pressure again, folding the initial bell shape back upon itself to create the final inverted flare. This two-step process forms a robust, double-walled flare, ensuring maximum strength and sealing capability.
How to Choose Bubble Flare and Inverted Flare?
Choosing between a bubble flare and an inverted flare is critical for the safety and integrity of fluid systems, particularly in automotive applications. The wrong choice can lead to dangerous leaks and system failures. Your decision should always prioritize compatibility with existing components and adherence to original equipment manufacturer (OEM) specifications.
When undertaking repairs or custom builds, accurately identifying the required flare type is paramount. Mixing flare types or using inappropriate tools will compromise the connection’s sealing capability. Always verify the flare style of the existing lines and fittings to ensure a safe and effective repair or modification.
- Vehicle Manufacturer and Region: European and some Asian vehicles commonly utilize bubble flares (DIN/ISO standard), while North American and many other Asian vehicles typically use inverted flares (SAE standard). Always consult the vehicle’s service manual or existing parts to confirm.
- Application Pressure and Vibration: Inverted flares, with their double-wall construction, offer superior strength and are generally preferred for high-pressure systems like brake lines where vibration is also a factor, providing a more robust seal.
- Existing Fittings and Ports: Carefully inspect the mating fitting or component’s port. A concave seat usually indicates a bubble flare, whereas a male conical seat points to an inverted flare. They are not interchangeable.
- Tooling Availability and Expertise: Ensure you have the correct flaring tool for the chosen flare type. Bubble flares require a different tool or die than inverted flares, and proper technique is essential for a reliable, leak-free connection.
- Material of Tubing: While both flares can be made with steel or copper-nickel tubing, the specific properties of the tubing material can influence the ease and quality of the flare formation. Consider material recommendations.
Conclusion
Understanding the distinctions between bubble flares and inverted flares is crucial for ensuring proper sealing and safety in various systems. While bubble flares offer excellent vibration resistance, inverted flares excel in high-pressure applications. Selecting the correct type prevents leaks and system failures.
Ultimately, the choice depends on the specific application’s requirements, including pressure, vibration, and fluid type. Prioritizing correct installation and fitting compatibility is paramount for reliable performance.
For all your hydraulic fitting needs, consider getting wholesale hydraulic fittings from Kingdaflex, a trusted supplier committed to quality and a wide range of options.
